Packard V-8 Performance

Compression Ratio

What would the compression ratio be if you used "whatever" cylinder heads you wanted for your Packard V-8?

    Combustion volume* for head
  • 96CC = 1955 352CID
  • 90CC = 1955 320CID
  • 85CC = 1956 All
  • 80CC = 1956 cut 0.060"
Comp Ratio, CID vs CC
CID96CC90CC85CC80CC
3207.8:18.3:18.8:19.2:1
3528.5:19.0:19.5:110.0:1
3749.0:19.5:110.0:110.6:1
Power Change, CID vs CC
CID96CC90CC85CC80CC
320-4%0+4%+7%
3520+3%+6%+9%
374-6%-3%0+3%

All percentage change are relative to the baseline for that CID. For example, putting a 1956 cylinder head on a 1955 352 would change the combustion volume* from 96CC to 85CC and the compression ratio from 8.5:1 to 9.5:1. The power would be increased by approximately 6% due to the increase in C.R. alone. The actual power gain would be even more because the 1956 Heads have a larger intake valve. See below for the effect of that change alone.

*Combustion volume is chamber volume plus head gasket thickness minus deck clearance volume.

Carburetor Performance

Bolting on a bigger (within reason) carburetor is a sure way to gain horsepower but not necessarily torque or driveability. All Packard V-8 4bbl intake manifolds are identical, but 4 different carburetors were fitted, each with a different flow capacity (CFM). Also, a new Edelbrock Performer (old Carter AFB style) carb may be fitted, but this requires either an adapter (OK) or machining the intake (best). In any case, what can you expect if you swap carbs? The chart below uses a 1955 352 CID Patrician/400 engine as the baseline. All power increases are relative to its stock carb (Rochestor 4GC-7007230).

Carburetors
BarrelsManufModelOEMCFM+Power
1x4CarterWCFB-2284S55 Jr3660
Rochester4GC-700723055 Sr3740
CarterWCFB-2394S56 Jr457+7HP
Rochester4GC-700861056 Sr486+8HP
Edelbrock1403none500+9HP
Edelbrock1406none625+13HP
2x4Rochester4GC-7008230/155 Carib748+15HP
Rochester4GC-7009600/156 Carib800?+15HP

Camshafts

The last "bolt-on" component to be considered in this analysis is the camshaft. Packard had 2 different camshafts, one for 1955 (P/N 440786) and one for 1956 (P/N 6480581). At that time, aftermarket camshaft maker Ed Iskenderian made "hotter" cam grinds available, the most popular of which was his E-2 profile. To keep things simple, we'll also sim a somewhat more radical camshaft from Craig's Panther Project: Again, the baseline engine is the 1955 352CID Patrician/400 engine which used originally used the 440786 cam.

Camshaft comparision
ManufIDInt durInt liftExh durExh lift+Power
Packard4407862500.3742500.3740
Packard64805812560.3982520.388+3HP
IskyE-2 Mechanical2560.4202560.420+27HP
LazerPanther2700.4962760.491+30HP

Note that ACTUALLY putting the Isky or Lazer cam in a completely stock engine is foolish. The engine and related components MUST match the camshaft grind to be effective!

Cylinder head performance

Putting combustion volume and compression ratio aside, there are basically 2 different Packard heads to choose from. The 1955 head which has a 1.937" intake valve and the 1956 head which has a 2.000" (6.6% larger) intake valve. On our baseline 1955 352CID Patrician/400 engine, the larger intake valve alone is worth about 1% increase in HP. Coupled with the power increase from the greater compression ratio (8.5:1 to 9.5:1), then the total increase HP is about 7%.

More power increase can be obtained by improving the head's airflow. The relatively simple "hot rod" techniques of cleaning up the casting flash, matching the intake port openings and a 3-angle valve job should result in about a 6% increase in horsepower.

Conclusions

Ading up all of the above individual improvements results in a total power increase of about 25%. However, the whole is greater than this sum because all these modifications work better together and individually. The "synergistic" is more than a 30% increase!